Overcoming Data Governance Challenges in AI Deployment


Posted on by Mike Green

The deployment and use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) brings about several data governance challenges encompassing data quality, privacy, security, and compliance with relevant regulatory frameworks. The integration of AI technologies into an organization’s systems, services, products, and infrastructure requires a robust data governance strategy to ensure the integrity, availability, and confidentiality of data. Several frameworks and best practices have emerged to address these challenges, with some being driven by governments, to include the US Executive order 14110 on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artifical Intelligence . The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) and supporting playbook provide guidelines on ensuring responsible AI deployment with a focus on data privacy and security and emphasizes the importance of data accuracy, consistency, and transparency in AI applications.

Data Governance Challenges

The data governance challenges in the deployment and use of AI, while significant, can be thoughtfully addressed using a structured framework and supporting processes.

  • Data Quality: The effectiveness of AI is deeply intertwined with the quality of the underlying data. For AI systems to deliver accurate and dependable outcomes, organizations must prioritize maintaining high standards of data quality. This involves ensuring that the data is accurate, consistent, and reliable. The presence of inaccurate or inconsistent data can result in flawed AI predictions and recommendations, potentially leading to significant errors in decision-making and operations. Therefore, rigorous attention to data integrity is crucial in the development and maintenance of AI-driven solutions.

  • Privacy: Ensuring the privacy of data is a fundamental aspect for organizations. It's imperative to protect sensitive information while complying with privacy regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Neglecting privacy safeguards can lead to legal consequences and erode public trust. Hence, robust privacy measures are essential in maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of data.

  • Security: The importance of data security in the deployment of AI systems cannot be overstated. Organizations are tasked with the crucial responsibility of protecting data against unauthorized access, breaches, and cyberattacks. A lapse in security measures can lead to severe repercussions, such as data leaks and significant reputational harm. Therefore, implementing robust security protocols is essential to safeguard the integrity and confidentiality of data in AI applications.

  • Compliance: Adherence to regulatory and legal standards is a critical component of data governance for organizations. They must navigate and comply with an array of requirements concerning data usage. Failing to meet these compliance standards can lead to substantial fines and legal repercussions. Thus, ensuring compliance is vital for reducing risks associated with data management and usage.

Leveraging the NIST AI RMF

The NIST AI RMF and its Playbook provide a structured approach to address data governance challenges in AI through its core functions: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage.

  • Govern: This function focuses on establishing clear governance structures and policies for AI deployment and management. It includes setting up guidelines for data handling, privacy, and security. This ensures that there is a clear chain of accountability and responsibility regarding AI systems within the organization which in turn addresses data quality challenges in AI.

  • Map: Mapping involves understanding the AI landscape within the organization. It includes identifying the types of AI systems in use, their purposes, the data they handle, and their interaction with other systems and processes. This step is crucial for recognizing the flow of data and potential risks associated with it to address, privacy, security, and overall compliance.

  • Measure: This function focuses on assessing and monitoring the risks associated with AI systems. It involves analyzing the impact of AI on data quality, privacy, and security, and measuring the effectiveness of the controls put in place. Continuous monitoring helps in identifying emerging risks and taking proactive measures.

  • Manage: Managing involves continuously overseeing the AI systems to ensure they meet the set governance criteria and adjusting strategies as needed. This includes updating policies, processes, and controls in response to new threats, technological advancements, or changes in regulatory requirements.

Adherence to frameworks such as the AI RMF and the adoption of related best practices are crucial in mitigating data governance challenges. Organizations need to establish clear policies on data management, access controls, and data protection to not only ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements but also to build trust with stakeholders. Additionally, training and awareness programs on data governance are essential to ensure that all stakeholders understand their roles and responsibilities in managing and protecting data. Continuous monitoring and auditing of AI systems and data management processes are also crucial for ensuring ongoing trustworthiness and identifying potential issues before they escalate. By applying these core functions, organizations can effectively address the challenges of data quality, privacy, security, and compliance in their AI initiatives, ensuring responsible and ethical use of AI technologies.

Contributors
Mike Green

Cybersecurity Engineer, Optic Cyber Solutions

Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning governance risk & compliance risk management compliance management policy management law security intelligence security awareness

Blogs posted to the RSAConference.com website are intended for educational purposes only and do not replace independent professional judgment. Statements of fact and opinions expressed are those of the blog author individually and, unless expressly stated to the contrary, are not the opinion or position of RSA Conference™, or any other co-sponsors. RSA Conference does not endorse or approve, and assumes no responsibility for, the content, accuracy or completeness of the information presented in this blog.


Share With Your Community

Related Blogs