Beyond the SOC: Embracing Risk Operations Centers for Cyber Resilience


Posted on by Aditya Gupta

Security Operations Centers (SOCs) have been the cornerstone of cybersecurity, excelling in threat detection and response. However, reactive measures are no longer sufficient as cyberthreats surge in volume and sophistication, driven by cloud architectures, third-party integrations, hybrid workforces, and AI-driven applications. Organizations must anticipate and mitigate risks before they materialize. Risk Operations Centers (ROCs) represent a strategic evolution, acting as real-time, risk-aligned command centers that prioritize emerging threats and align cybersecurity with business objectives. This shift from reactive protection to proactive resilience is critical in an era where cyber risks are existential business challenges.

Why Traditional SOCs Are Falling Behind

Traditional SOCs, designed for alert triage and incident response, were effective in simpler, more static environments. Today’s dynamic digital landscape demands more.

Real-World Impact of SOC Limitations

In a global healthcare organization, the SOC flagged an intrusion on a third-party system hosting patient data only after exfiltration occurred. The lack of upstream risk visibility and business context led to significant reputational and regulatory damage, underscoring SOC limitations. The 2024 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report reveals that 15% of breaches in 2023 involved supply chain vulnerabilities, with attackers exploiting third-party systems at an unprecedented rate. SOCs often operate in silos, disconnected from enterprise risk frameworks, and rely on reactive tools, making them ill-equipped to handle the scale and complexity of modern threats.

The Rise of the Risk Operations Center

A Risk Operations Center is not merely a rebranded SOC but a transformative approach to cybersecurity. ROCs integrate telemetry from security logs, operational KPIs, third-party risk scores, and threat intelligence feeds to deliver a real-time view of risk exposure. Unlike SOCs, which focus on monitoring and reacting, ROCs forecast and prevent, asking, “What could happen next, and how do we prepare?” The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 supports this evolution with its “Govern” function, emphasizing the integration of cybersecurity with enterprise risk management and proactive supply chain risk management. This alignment enables ROCs to make faster, smarter decisions, positioning cybersecurity as a strategic business function.

How Risk Operations Centers Work

ROCs operate at the intersection of security analytics, risk intelligence, and business strategy, prioritizing risks based on their potential business impact rather than just technical severity. Two real-world examples illustrate their value:

In a manufacturing firm with a decentralized supplier network, the ROC continuously assessed third-party digital risks by ingesting external threat intelligence and cross-referencing supplier IP ranges. When a ransomware campaign targeting an Eastern European vendor emerged, the ROC’s early warning system enabled preemptive containment, minimizing production disruptions. A traditional SOC would likely have detected the threat only after lateral movement began.

Similarly, a North American financial institution embedded a ROC to align security with enterprise risk management. By mapping digital assets to critical functions like online banking and payment processing, the ROC used AI to evaluate emerging threats. When a zero-day exploit targeting financial Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) surfaced, the ROC prioritized response based on technical and operational impacts, reducing containment time and enabling the CISO to present a business-aligned narrative to the board, securing increased security funding.

Key Benefits of a Risk Operations Center

ROCs deliver several transformative advantages for modern cybersecurity programs, beginning with proactive threat mitigation. By harnessing predictive analytics, they identify vulnerabilities and threat patterns before exploitation occurs, significantly reducing dwell time and enabling earlier intervention. This foresight fundamentally enhances breach prevention efforts compared to traditional reactive approaches.

Another core benefit is alignment with business risk. Unlike SOCs that focus primarily on technical severity, ROCs quantify risks in terms of revenue impact, reputational exposure, and regulatory consequences. This shift elevates cybersecurity discussions to the boardroom. As Gartner has noted, aligning Cyber Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) with enterprise risk management is essential to navigating digital transformation and increasing regulatory scrutiny.

Risk modeling and visualization are also central to the ROC approach. These centers provide dynamic dashboards showing live risk exposure, trending vulnerabilities, and the ROI of mitigation efforts. Frameworks like the OWASP Risk Rating Methodology further enable structured prioritization of risks by integrating both technical severity and business impact into the decision-making process. The use of AI-driven intelligence helps streamline operations by automating threat prioritization and correlating incident data. This not only reduces analyst fatigue but also ensures that resources are focused on the highest-risk scenarios.

Lastly, ROCs encourage cross-functional collaboration, embedding risk accountability across security, operations, compliance, and business units. By breaking down organizational silos, ROCs cultivate a cyber-aware culture where risk is understood and shared across the enterprise.

Addressing the Challenges of ROC Implementation

Despite their benefits, implementing the ROC model presents several challenges. One of the most common is dealing with legacy infrastructure. Many existing SOCs operate on siloed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platforms and outdated dashboards. Transitioning to a ROC often requires integrating new platforms capable of aggregating diverse data streams, though overlay tools can help modernize capabilities without fully replacing existing systems. Another significant challenge lies in organizational silos. A successful ROC must move beyond IT-centric paradigms and foster shared governance among security, risk, and business stakeholders. Without this collaboration, the ROC's full potential remains untapped.

Talent and training gaps can also impede implementation. ROCs demand a blend of cybersecurity expertise, risk analytics, and business communication skills. As a result, upskilling initiatives focused on risk modeling and stakeholder engagement are critical to building high-performing ROC teams.

Finally, there’s the matter of investment justification. While upfront costs may be substantial, the long-term return on investment can be compelling. ROCs reduce breach-related losses, enhance regulatory compliance, and optimize resource use. For CISOs, building a business case that emphasizes operational resilience and risk reduction is key to gaining executive buy-in.

Starting the ROC Journey

Organizations looking to embrace the ROC model can start by assessing their SOC maturity, identifying existing gaps in risk visibility, and alignment with business objectives. This evaluation creates a baseline from which progress can be measured.

Next, it's crucial to map cyber risks to key business functions, such as digital customer services or supply chain operations. Prioritizing protection for these high-impact areas ensures that security investments align with operational imperatives. Developing risk-centric dashboards is another early step. Tools such as heat maps and mitigation timelines can help translate technical risks into executive-level insights, enabling informed and timely decisions. A more advanced move is to strategically incorporate threat intelligence into risk modeling. Rather than simply consuming raw feeds, ROCs should embed intelligence into their decision workflows, contextualizing threats based on likelihood and impact.

Finally, organizations should pilot ROC capabilities in targeted, high-risk domains. Focusing on supply chain operations, for example, can offer quick wins and demonstrate value. Once proven, these capabilities can be scaled across the enterprise.

Embracing the ROC Imperative

In an era where digital risks threaten business survival, traditional SOCs are no longer adequate. Risk Operations Centers transform cybersecurity into a proactive, risk-aligned function, integrating people, processes, and platforms to deliver foresight and agility. For CISOs, this shift is not just operational but transformational, enabling organizations to navigate today’s complex threat landscape and prepare for future uncertainties. The future of cyber resilience begins with embracing the ROC.

Contributors
Aditya Gupta

Industry Principal, Infosys

Blogs posted to the RSAConference.com website are intended for educational purposes only and do not replace independent professional judgment. Statements of fact and opinions expressed are those of the blog author individually and, unless expressly stated to the contrary, are not the opinion or position of RSAC™ Conference, or any other co-sponsors. RSAC™ Conference does not endorse or approve, and assumes no responsibility for, the content, accuracy or completeness of the information presented in this blog.


Share With Your Community

Related Blogs