Library Header Image Library Header Image

The State of Cybersecurity Burnout in 2026


Posted on by Tatyana Sanchez

Key Takeaways:
  • Burnout is widespread: AI is driving heavier workloads, with about 11 extra hours a week and high attrition.
  • It's systemic: The causes are organizational, so yoga and meditation only ease symptoms.
  • Fix it top-down: Start at the organizational level, then the team, then the individual. 94% would still choose this career.

Cybersecurity Burnout by the Numbers

The cybersecurity threat landscape is intensifying. Cyberattacks now account for 80% of all data breaches and the average cost of a single breach in the United States has reached an all-time high of $10.22 million, a 9% year-over-year increase.

AI cyberattacks have placed enormous pressure on security teams and leaders, who must stay alert to threats around the clock, with no clear "off" switch. According to reports from Darktrace and Cybermindz the result is widespread stress and burnout across the industry.

According to Darktrace’s annual State of AI Cybersecurity Report 2026 , 73% of security professionals say AI-powered cyberthreats are having a significant impact on their organization, and 87% say AI is significantly increasing their team’s workload.

That strain is already taking a human toll. As Jen Easterly, CEO of RSAC, discussed in an episode of the Cyber at the Top podcast, the Cybermindz iRest® Impact Study found that 74% of CISOs report security team attrition driven by stress, and roughly two-thirds of incident responders have sought mental health support after a major incident. And Peter Coroneos, Founder of Cybermindz, echoed this concern, "In terms of exhaustion, we're tracking around 66% reporting high or moderate emotional exhaustion—completely run out."

Security teams juggle endless alerts and false positives while still trying to make time for strategic work. Maintaining work-life balance under these conditions is a persistent struggle. Seemplicity 2026 State of the Cybersecurity Workforce Research Report surveyed 300 cybersecurity and IT professionals and found that cybersecurity leadership is now operating on a baseline of persistent overtime, effectively institutionalizing a "sixth workday."

Key findings include:

Professionals work an average of 10.8 extra hours per week

45% of the workforce logs 11+ extra hours weekly

1 in 5 professionals work more than 16 additional hours per week

The Why: What's Actually Driving It

Three main AI-driven factors are fueling stress and burnout across the industry:

1. Cognitive Load: The Complexity Compression

AI has fundamentally changed the scale of information analysts must process. An analyst who once reviewed 50–100 manually curated reports now review AI-summarized reports. While AI accelerates the process, it also increases the sheer volume of data analysts must act on—and with that comes a higher rate of false positives to sort through, adding another layer of cognitive strain.

2. Speed Disparity: Reaction Stress

AI-driven, autonomous attack agents operate 24/7 and never take breaks. Security teams must identify these threats, trace their origin, and determine how to mitigate them — all while trying to keep pace with a speed no human team can naturally match. The result is often longer workdays, as teams stretch to close the gap between machine speed and human response time.

3. Opaque Logic: The "Black Box" Trust Crisis

When an AI system flags a threat with a risk score of 94 out of 100, an analyst may have only seconds to decide whether to act. Without full visibility into how that score was generated, analysts are forced to make high-stakes decisions with incomplete information.

The Human Cost of Incident Response

Responding to a breach or active threat is physically and mentally taxing. During major incidents, teams shift into extended overtime to mitigate risk—but teams can only sustain that pace for so long before performance starts to shut down. Sustained periods like this take a measurable toll on:

  • Decision-making accuracy
  • Working memory (the ability to retain information from moments earlier in the incident)
  • Pattern recognition
  • Cognitive flexibility
  • Emotional regulation
  • Communication effectiveness

“This isn't a matter of psychological weakness — it's neurobiology,” as George Kamide, Executive Director & Co-Founder at Mind Over Cyber stated in an RSATM Conference 2026  presentation. Cognitive performance naturally declines under sustained high-stress conditions, both during and after an incident, as a function of how the brain responds to prolonged stress.

Solutions: Free, Practical Ways to Recover and Protect Your Mental Health

While cybersecurity professionals are feeling overwhelmed, the Seemplicity report found that 94% would still choose cybersecurity again as a career. Despite being overwhelmed, the passion remains. So how do we foster the passion without creating burnout?

To address burnout, it helps to understand where pressure actually comes from. “Pressure builds when external demands, internal expectations, or both exceed our perceived ability to cope with, adapt to, or control the outcome,” As Susan Bernstein, CEO at Powerful Under Pressure explained in an RSA Conference 2026 presentation.

Yoga, meditation, stress-management workshops, and employee resource groups are common and genuinely helpful. But they treat the symptoms, not the system producing the pressure. It's like needing surgery and taking pain medication instead. You get a few hours of relief, then the pain returns.

Pressure is produced systemically, inside the organization, and the burden shouldn't fall on individuals alone.

Bernstein recommends starting with the three cascading levels. When a CISO is burned out, capacity has been exceeded at the organization, then the team, then the individual level. She advises beginning at the organizational level. It takes longer, but changes there ripple down to the other two.

She used these capacity-boosting approaches with two leaders, one in risk management and one in operations. The risk leader saw a 42% drop in burnout. The operations leader saw a 25% drop in burnout and a 22% increase in productivity.

Level 1: Organizational—increase control over resources and authority

The first shift is moving from insufficient influence to strategic influence. That means building proactive relationships with the C-suite and board rather than showing up only during incidents.

The second is moving from underfunded to well-funded by translating the risk of underfunding into business exposure, including revenue, reputation, regulatory penalties, and business continuity

The third is moving from unclear decision-making to clear, shared decision-making. Map accountability-authority gaps, where people are held responsible for outcomes they don't have the power to control, and redistribute workload and responsibility accordingly. Partnering closely with HR and business leadership strengthens the case for funding the resources needed to prevent burnout.

Level 2: Team — build structure that protects capacity

Measure burnout every 30 days using validated assessments, such as the free Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (figure 1 below) to maintain awareness and leadership buy-in. Also create workload coverage plans so critical roles get intentional downtime, not just whatever time is left over, if any.

Mental heath assessment

Figure 1.

Level 3: Individual — build awareness and connection

Run regular "battery checks." Journaling about how you're doing mentally, emotionally, and physically helps you notice when you're ratcheting toward burnout before you hit the wall. Build peer support and coaching networks, too. Communities like Mind Over Cyber reduce isolation and help recalibrate unrealistic self-expectations. Personal practices like yoga, meditation, and guided rest still have a place, but as support alongside systemic change.

At every level, encourage open conversations about capacity and limits. When leaders share their own limits, it shows capacity is a shared responsibility, not a personal failing.

Remember that 94% of cybersecurity professionals would choose this career again. They aren't looking to leave the field. They're looking for a way to keep going without burning out physically, emotionally, and mentally.

To learn more about cybersecurity leadership and workforce development, watch our RSAC September virtual seminar here.

Contributors
Tatyana Sanchez

Senior Coordinator, Content & Programming, RSAC

Blogs posted to the RSAConference.com website are intended for educational purposes only and do not replace independent professional judgment. Statements of fact and opinions expressed are those of the blog author individually and, unless expressly stated to the contrary, are not the opinion or position of RSAC™ Conference, or any other co-sponsors. RSAC Conference does not endorse or approve, and assumes no responsibility for, the content, accuracy or completeness of the information presented in this blog.


Share With Your Community

Related Blogs